How Much Room for Discourse in Imperative?: The Lens of Interface on English, Italian and Spanish

Mara Frascarelli ^[2] ; Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández ^[1]
1. [1] Universidad de Sevilla
  
  Universidad de Sevilla
  
  Sevilla, España
2. [2] University of Roma Tre
Localización: Studia linguistica: A journal of general linguistics, ISSN 0039-3193, Vol. 75, Nº 3, 2021, págs. 375-434
Idioma: inglés
Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)

Resumen
- This paper discusses root phenomena in imperative clauses, assuming as diagnostics conversational dynamics and the type of discourse categories that are admitted in their C-domain, through a systematic comparative interface investigation in three languages (English, Italian and Spanish) based on an original experimental work. This novel perspective sheds new light on the syntax-semantics mapping and the interface (syntax-prosody) properties of imperative clauses, embedding the relevant proposal in a cartographic framework of analysis. Based on a twofold distinction of root phenomena – those which are widely allowed in Common Ground-active (Type I) contexts and those which can occur in non-Common Ground-active contexts (Type II) – it is proposed that imperatives are non-Common Ground-active propositions with no update potential, thus allowing only Type II root phenomena. Syntactically, imperative clauses are dominated by a super-ordinate Speech Act Phrase, including the Speaker and the Addressee as co-arguments, which explains the blocking effects identified in imperatives.