Biomaterials in periapical regeneration after microsurgical endodontics: a narrative review

• Paloma Montero-Miralles ^[1] ; Rafael Ibáñez-Barranco ^[1] ; Daniel Cabanillas-Balsera ^[1] ; Victoria Areal-Quecuty ^[1] ; Benito Sánchez-Domínguez ^[1] ; Jenifer Martín-González ^[1] ; Juan J. Segura-Egea ^[1] ; María C. Jiménez-Sánchez ^[2]
  1. [1] Universidad de Sevilla

     Universidad de Sevilla

     Sevilla, España

     
  2. [2] DDS, MSc, PhD, Materials Science Institute of Sevilla (ICMS), Joint CSIC-University of Sevilla Center, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
• Localización: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, ISSN-e 1989-5488, Vol. 13, Nº. 9 (September), 2021, págs. 935-940
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The objective of this narrative review was to analyze the available scientific evidence regarding the application of biomaterials in endodontic microsurgery and its influence in post-surgical tissue repair.

    The review question was Do biomaterials used in endodontic microsurgery influence post-surgical tissue repair and regeneration? Systematic MEDLINE/PubMed review was used to evaluate and present the results.

    The search yielded 131 references, 82 of which were selected for full text review after reading the abstracts. After a manual search in the references of the articles selected, 52 references were eliminated. Finally, 30 articles were selected.

    Bone grafts, membranes and bioceramics, especially MTA, are biomaterials with the ability to stimulate periapical tissue regeneration. This is one of many reason why bioceramics are the best choice as retrograde sealing materials. However, microsurgically treated periapical lesions can heal completely without the need to use bone grafts or membranes. Those techniques are indicated in endodontic microsurgery when additional stimulation of tissue regeneration is required, or when bone collapse needs to be prevented.