Puglia. Un rinvio «sproporzionato» alla fonte statale, un contenuto sostanziale vago ed impreciso: il «caso» dell’ordinanza del Presidente della Giunta regionale pugliese del 3 otto- bre 2020, n. 374, in tema di «Misure urgenti per la ge- stione dell’emergenza epidemiologica da COVID-19»

• Autores: Andrea Bonomi
• Localización: Regioni: Bimestrale di analisi giuridica e istituzionale, ISSN 0391-7576, Nº. 1-2, 2021, págs. 438-448
• Idioma: italiano
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The paper focuses on examining two problematic profiles of a constitutional nature underlying an order issued by the President of the apulian Region and aimed at containing the negative effects of COVID-19 in the Region. The first profile is connected to the lack of proportionality of the administrative sanction contemplated by art. 3 of the ordinance; the second profile is attributable to the lack of clarity of both the substantial content provided for by art. 1 of the ordinance and the exceptions established in art. 2 of the same ordinance with consequent violation of the principle of precision which by the Constitutional Court is also considered applicable to the provisions that establish a formally administrative but «substantially punitive» sanction