Validity and Reliability of Using Load-Velocity Relationship Profiles to Establish Back Squat 1 m[middle dot]s-1 Load

Nathan Elsworthy; Dean E. Callaghan; Aaron T. Scanlan; Alex H.M. Kertesz; Crystal O. Kean; Benjamin J. Dascombe; Joshua H. Guy

Ayuda

Validity and Reliability of Using Load-Velocity Relationship Profiles to Establish Back Squat 1 m[middle dot]s-1 Load

Nathan Elsworthy ^[1] ; Dean E. Callaghan ^[1] ; Aaron T. Scanlan ; Alex H.M. Kertesz ^[2] ; Crystal O. Kean ; Benjamin J. Dascombe ; Joshua H. Guy
1. [1] Central Queensland University
  
  Central Queensland University
  
  Australia
2. [2] Mackay Cutters Rugby League Club, Mackay, Queensland, Australia
Localización: Journal of strength and conditioning research: the research journal of the NSCA, ISSN 1064-8011, Vol. 35, Nº. 2, 2021, págs. 340-346
Idioma: inglés
Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
Resumen
- Although measuring movement velocity during resistance exercise is being increasingly used to monitor player readiness for competition in team sports, the validity and reliability of using set target velocities has not been examined. This study examined test-retest reliability of the load-velocity relationship during the back squat to predict loads corresponding to a mean velocity of 1 m[middle dot]s-1 (V1Load), test-retest reliability of mean concentric velocity at V1Load, and criterion validity of mean concentric velocity at V1Load. Twenty-seven resistance-trained male rugby league players completed 2 testing sessions on separate days to establish individualized back squat load-velocity relationship profiles (30, 40, 60, and 80% estimated 1 repetition maximum). Velocity during the back squat was assessed at each load and V1Load derived using individualized linear regression equations. A subset of subjects (n = 18) also performed the back squat at predicted V1Load to examine the test-retest reliability and compare the mean concentric velocity with the predicted target of 1 m[middle dot]s-1. The mean concentric velocity was consistent across all loads during load-velocity relationship testing (p > 0.05, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] >=0.75, coefficient of variation [CV] <=5.7%, effect size [ES] <=0.27), and for predicting V1Load (p = 0.11, ICC = 0.95, CV = 3.9%, ES = 0.11). The mean concentric velocity at V1Load was reliable (ICC = 0.77; CV = 2.6%; ES = 0.39) and not significantly different (p = 0.21) to the target velocity, supporting criterion validity. Individualized load-velocity profiles for the back squat can accurately predict V1Load, and subsequent use of V1Load to assess back squat velocity is valid and reliable. Using V1Load to assess changes in back squat velocity may have application in measuring changes in strength and power or readiness to train.