Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer: follow-up of the Spanish Head and Neck Cancer Group (TTCC) 2503 Trial

    1. [1] Hospital Severo Ochoa

      Hospital Severo Ochoa

      Madrid, España

    2. [2] Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

      Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

      Barcelona, España

    3. [3] Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

      Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

      Valencia, España

    4. [4] Hospital Clinic Barcelona

      Hospital Clinic Barcelona

      Barcelona, España

    5. [5] Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Burgos

      Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Burgos

      Burgos, España

    6. [6] Hospital Miguel Servet

      Hospital Miguel Servet

      Zaragoza, España

    7. [7] Hospital del Mar

      Hospital del Mar

      Barcelona, España

    8. [8] Hospital Universitario de Salamanca

      Hospital Universitario de Salamanca

      Salamanca, España

    9. [9] Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid
    10. [10] Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza
  • Localización: Clinical & translational oncology, ISSN 1699-048X, Vol. 23, Nº. 4, 2021, págs. 764-772
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • Background Our previous phase-3 study (TTCC 2503) failed to show overall survival advantage of 2 induction chemotherapy (IC) regimens followed by standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) over CRT alone in patients with unresectable locally advanced head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). This study described the long-term survival of those patients.

      Materials and methods Long-term follow-up study of patients with untreated LAHNSCC assigned to IC (three cycles), with either docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF arm) or cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF arm), followed by CRT, or CRT alone, included in the previous TTCC 2503 trial.

      Results In the intention-to-treat population (n = 439), the median OS times were 25.4 (95% CI, 16.8–34.4), 26.2 (95% CI, 18.2–36.6) and 25.4 months (95% CI, 17.4–36.0) in the TPF-CRT, PF-CRT and CRT arms, respectively (log-rank p = 0.51). In the per-protocol population (n = 355), patients with larynx–hypopharynx primary tumors treated with IC (TPF or PF) followed by CRT had a longer median PFS than those who received CRT alone. Moreover, patients with ECOG 0 treated with IC (TPF or PF) followed by CRT had a better TTF than those with CRT alone. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of OS, PFS or TTF, according to the tumor load or affected nodes.

      Conclusion After a long follow-up, the TTCC 2503 trial failed to show the benefit of IC-CRT in unresectable LAHNSCC regarding the primary end point. However, fit patients with ECOG 0 and primary larynx–hypopharyngeal tumors may benefit from the use of IC if administered by an experienced team.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno