Investigation of the efficacy of an online tool for improving the diagnosis of macular lesions imaged by optical coherence tomography

• Paul Grace ^[1] ; Bruce J.W. Evans ^{[1] [5]} ; David F. Edgar ^[4] ; Praveen J. Patel ^[2] ; Dhanes Thomas ^[3] ; Gerald Mahon ^[6] ; Alison Blake ^[7] ; David Bennett ^[8]
  1. [1] London South Bank University

     London South Bank University

     Reino Unido

     
  2. [2] Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

     Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

     Reino Unido

     
  3. [3] Moorfields Eye Hospital

     Moorfields Eye Hospital

     Reino Unido

     
  4. [4] University of London

     University of London

     Reino Unido

     
  5. [5] Institute of Optometry, London, UK
  6. [6] Ophthalmic Imaging Dept.,RVH, Belfast, UK
  7. [7] Optometrist, Bury St Edmunds, UK
  8. [8] Optometrist, Brooks and Wardman, Nottingham, UK

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Journal of Optometry: peer-reviewed Journal of the Spanish General Council of Optometry, ISSN-e 1888-4296, Vol. 14, Nº. 2, 2021, págs. 206-214
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Purpose Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive method for diagnosis and monitoring of retinal (typically, macular) conditions. The unfamiliar nature of OCT images can present considerable challenges for some community optometrists.

    The purpose of this research is to develop and assess the efficacy of a novel internet resource designed to assist optometrists in using OCT for diagnosis of macular disease and patient management.

    Methods An online tool (OCTAID) has been designed to assist practitioners in the diagnosis of macular lesions detected by OCT. The effectiveness of OCTAID was evaluated in a randomised controlled trial comparing two groups of practitioners who underwent an online assessment (using clinical vignettes) based on OCT images, before (exam 1) and after (exam 2) an educational intervention. Participants’ answers were validated against experts’ classifications (the reference standard). OCTAID was randomly allocated as the educational intervention for one group with the control group receiving an intervention of standard OCT educational material. The participants were community optometrists.

    Results Random allocation resulted in 53 optometrists receiving OCTAID and 65 receiving the control intervention. Both groups performed similarly at baseline with no significant difference in mean exam 1 scores (p = 0.21). The primary outcome measure was mean improvement in exam score between the two exam modules. Participants who received OCTAID improved their exam score significantly more than those who received conventional educational materials (p = 0.005).

    Conclusion Use of OCTAID is associated with an improvement in the combined skill of OCT scan recognition and patient management decisions.