Resumen de Personality, intelligence, and counterproductive academic behaviors: A meta-analysis.
Dámaris Cuadrado González, Jesús Fernando Salgado Velo, Silvia Moscoso Ruibal
Counterproductive academic behaviors (CAB) are a major problem for educational institutions all over the world. For this reason, to determine the potential predictors of CAB is relevant. After defining CAB and introducing a typology of seven CABs facets (i.e., cheating, absenteeism, plagiarism, deception, breach of rules, low effort, and misuse of resources), this study reports on a comprehensive meta-analysis carried out to estimate the relationships between CAB and its facets with the Big Five personality dimensions and intelligence. Results showed that conscientiousness (K = 77, N = 31,473, ρ = −.28) and agreeableness (K = 56, N = 24,436, ρ = −.14) were predictors of the student’s propensity to engage in CAB. Conscientiousness also predicted the 7 facets of CAB, particularly absenteeism (ρ = −.30), cheating (ρ = −.34), misuse of resources (ρ = −.32), low effort (ρ = −.29), and breach of rules (ρ = −.27). Intelligence showed a negative relationship with CAB (K = 55, N = 30,052, ρ = −.19), and it was the best predictor of deception (K = 18, N = 3,575 ρ = −.48). The educational level, the type of cognitive tests, and the intelligence factor assessed were relevant moderators of the validity estimates. The validity of a compound of conscientiousness, agreeableness, and intelligence was .42 for predicting overall CAB. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
