In this paper, I juxtapose the demand for castration as a law reform measure with the parallel legal discourse on “emasculation” as the crime of grievous hurt. Juxtaposing these discourses on crime and punishment, I point to the curious lack of engagement with castration as a punishment with emasculation as a crime. The story of emasculation is found in the legal history of grievous hurt. I have argued that the legal interpretation of emasculation has different outcomes depending on the gender of the accused. Judges are unable to name male victimhood, while the law is punitive toward women who attack their assailants in self-defense.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados