The last two procedural reforms (2009 and 2011) have considerably limited access to regular appeals in the execution process. There is no cassation —before, there were rare exceptions—, the appeals are scarce and the ploughing back and revisions can be replaced by other means of challenge (Sections 562.3 and 563 LEC (Civil Procedural Act). Contrary to what it might look like, there has been no loss of rights, because the limitation of these appeals is justified by the bigger clarity of the enforceable titles, a legal obligation from the new Civil Procedural Act and the need to protect the course of the execution by avoiding procrastination or a generic and disproportionate attack against the patrimony of the judgment debtor.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados