Being Consistent Matters: Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Rule Consistency on Citizen Red Tape

• Autores: Wesley Kaufmann, Alex Ingrams, Daan Jacobs
• Localización: The American review of public administration, ISSN 0275-0740, Vol. 51, Nº. 1, 2021, págs. 28-39
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • A growing stream of research in public administration is concerned with how red tape and administrative burden affects citizens. Drawing on the procedural fairness literature, we argue that the consistent application of rules reduces perceived red tape. We also hypothesize that red tape perceptions are affected by outcome favorability and that an interaction effect exists between consistency and outcome favorability. Our reasoning is tested with a survey experiment in the context of a federal jury duty summons procedure, and administered to a sample of U.S. citizens through TurkPrime. The statistical results support our hypotheses; perceived red tape is lower if rules are applied consistently and if citizens receive a favorable outcome. We also find that consistently applying a procedure reduces perceived red tape further when citizens receive a favorable outcome. The implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed.