Anticipating a new conservation bureaucracy? Land and power in Indonesia’s Essential Ecosystem Area policy
-
Sahide, Muhammad Alif K. [1] ; Fisher, Micah [1] ; Nasri, Nasri [1] ; Dharmiasih, Wiwik [2] ; Verheijen, Bart [3] ; Maryudi, Ahmad [4]
-
[1] Hasanuddin University
Hasanuddin University
Indonesia
-
[2] Udayana University
Udayana University
Indonesia
-
[3] University of Amsterdam
University of Amsterdam
Países Bajos
-
[4] Gadjah Mada University
Gadjah Mada University
Indonesia
-
- Localización: Land use policy: The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use, ISSN 0264-8377, ISSN-e 1873-5754, Nº. 97, 2020
- Idioma: inglés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
-
Resumen
As an emerging policy in Indonesia, “Essential Ecosystem Areas” (EEA) is being established as an instrument to expand protections for conservation areas at sites beyond the classical domain of the conservation bureaucracy. The policy impetus is from recent global research identifying high conservation values located outside of formally designated conservation areas. EEA policy provides a foundation for justifying conservation practices at sites based on high biodiversity indicators, but which might not have previously held formal protections. This policy instrument is particularly unique in Indonesia because it is envisioned to support initiatives that emerge voluntarily, even in areas that might not have been historically thought of as conservation areas. This is unusual because it applies to all land categories, including private and public lands. In this article, we introduce the EEA policy and identify the potential applications it might have, considering the possibilities for future conservation area management in Indonesia. In particular, we identify some key principles for researchers and practitioners to follow when assessing EEA implementation. Our organizing framework consists of several elements based on existing land and power characteristics, which we connect to the institutions that might emerge amidst these new policy arrangements. We apply the land and power framework to two emerging EEA sites in Sulawesi to anticipate the extent to which the policy suggests a future trajectory for conservation management, or whether conservation policy will remain tied to existing rigid bureaucratic structures. Findings from the two cases point to the continued primacy of the centralized conservation bureaucracy, indicating that EEA sites are being negotiated through the classical approach for administering conservation areas.
