Why Do Countries Respond Differently to COVID-19? A Comparative Study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan

• Autores: Bo Yan, Xiaomin Zhang, Long Wu, Heng Zhu, Bin Chen
• Localización: The American review of public administration, ISSN 0275-0740, Vol. 50, Nº. 6-7, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Special issue: Double Issue Dedicated to COVID-19), págs. 762-769
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 3 Citas
• Resumen

  • Nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are important public health tools to fight against COVID-19. Governments around the world have instituted a variety of NPIs to modify individuals’ behavior, giving rise to four distinct pandemic response strategies: nudge, mandate, decree, and boost. To better understand the different policy choices involved in these strategies, four countries including Sweden, China, France, and Japan were compared to identify the critical institutional and cultural determinants of national response strategy. The finding shows that various responses regarding same threat are dependent on the distinctive institutional arrangements and cultural orientation of each country, and thus, there is no One-Size-Fits-All strategy.