Especificación de un modelo para el estudio de la percepción de utilidad

osé Alfonso Aguilar-Fuentes ^[1] ; Cruz García-Lirios ^[2] ; Gilberto Bermúdez-Ruiz ^[3] ; Minerva Isabel Pérez-Ortega ^[4] ; Eyder Bolivar-Mojica ^[5] ; Sofía López de Nava Tapia ^[6] ; Francisco Espinoza-Morales ^[7] ; Tirso Javier Hernández-Gracia ^[8] ; Gabriel Pérez-Crisanto ^[9]
1. [1] Universidad Tecnológica de México
  
  Universidad Tecnológica de México
  
  México
2. [2] Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México
  
  Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México
  
  México
3. [3] Universidad Anáhuac
  
  Universidad Anáhuac
  
  México
4. [4] Universidad de Cantabria
  
  Universidad de Cantabria
  
  Santander, España
5. [5] Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigó
  
  Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigó
  
  Colombia
6. [6] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  
  Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  
  México
7. [7] Universidad de Sonora
  
  Universidad de Sonora
  
  México
8. [8] Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo
  
  Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo
  
  México
9. [9] Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana
  
  Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana
  
  México
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Localización: Revista de Comunicación y Salud: RCyS, ISSN-e 2173-1675, Vol. 9, Nº. 2, 2019, págs. 47-54
Idioma: español
Títulos paralelos:
- Specification of a model for the study of utility perception
Enlaces
- Texto completo (pdf)

Resumen
- A model is a data management, production and transfer system organized in explanatory trends of past, current and future relationships. The emphasis on each suggests decision making and strategy execution. The objective of this work was to specify a model for of the perception of utility. An exploratory and cross-sectional study was conducted with a selection of 186 students from a public university in central Mexico, considering their participation in the system of professional practices and social service in local organizations. The validity of the instrument that found a one-dimensional variable that explained 43% of the variance was established, but the research design limited the results to the research scenario, suggesting the extension of the work.