Bridging the gap between national and ecosystem accounting
- Autores: Pablo Campos Macías, Alejandro Caparrós Gass, José L. Oviedo, Paola Ovando Pol, Begoña Álvarez Farizo, Luis Díaz Balteiro, Juan Carranza Almansa, Santiago Beguería Portugués, Mario Diaz Fernandez, Antonio Casimiro Herruzo Martínez, Fernando Martínez Peña, Mario Soliño, Alejandro Álvarez, María Martínez Jáuregui, María Pasalodos Tato, Pablo de Frutos Madrazo, Jorge Aldea, Eloy Almazán, Elena D. Concepción Cuevas, Bruno Mesa, Carlos Romero Moragas, Roberto Serrano Notivoli, Cristina Fernández, Jerónimo Torres Porras, Gregorio Montero
- Localización: Documentos de trabajo ( CSIC. Unidad de Políticas Comparadas ), Nº. 4 (Septiembre), 2017
- Idioma: inglés
- Enlaces
-
Resumen
National accounting either ignores or fails to give due values to a country´s ecosystem services, products, total income and environmental asset variations. To overcome these shortcomings, we develop a spatially-explicit extended ecosystem accounting framework, which we test in the Mediterranean forests of Andalusia (Spain). This framework goes beyond the production boundary of standard national accounting by considering four private activities (forestry, hunting, residential and private amenity) and six public activities (mushroom, carbon, water, recreation, landscape and threatened biodiversity). To keep valuation consistent with standard accounts, we simulate exchange values for non-market goods and services. Manufactured capital and environmental assets are also integrated. Upon comparing extended to standard accounts, our results are 3.7 and 2.9 higher for gross value added and total income, respectively. These differences are explained primarily by the undervaluation of recreation, landscape and threatened biodiversity, and the omission of private amenity, carbon and water activities in standard accounts. Extended accounts, with their implementation of simulated exchange values, demonstrate that standard accounts measures only 17% of Andalusian forest ecosystem services.
