Comparing the Chalcedoniarii formula (in Jesus Christ there is one person and two natures) with the Pauline one (in Christ Jesus there isn't man nor woman, master nor slave ...) or with the repeated affirmation by John Paul II which makes of the option in favour of the poor a criterion of Ghristian identity, the author seeks to bring the different formulae closer to each other. At the same time the paper tries to find the praxical hermeneutics of the Christological dogmas, from the conviction that every Christian truth finds its verification in the praxis which it is capable of generating. This drawing nearer of the different positions would be possible if the concrete terms of the dogmatic formulae were disregarded (consubstantií~lity, subsistence, nature ...) which are tributary to a contingent philosophy, and the ((formal schema)) was attended to: a dualized unity without mixture, separation or return to the previous state.
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados