Resumen de The Canadian living tree doctrine as a comparative model of evolutionary constitutional interpretation
This paper starts with a general contextualisation of how Canadian constitutional law acquired an important role in global constitutional conversations in recent decades. It then considers, in particular, the well-known Canadian Living tree doctrine as a model of evolutionary constitutional interpretation, and argues that it is a relevant case study for our purposes since it is able to precisely link the 'history, evolution, influence and reform' of constitutional law in a comprehensive doctrine. The doctrine's comparative influence will be analysed in particular: The Living tree is especially relevant, since its comparative influence is traceable both in the work of courts that are historical participants in transnational judicial conversations, and courts that are new players in the game. © 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons.
