From procedural disagreement to joint scrutiny?: The interparliamentary conference on stability, economic coordination and governance

• Autores: Valentin Kreilinger
• Localización: Perspectives on Federalism, ISSN-e 2036-5438, Vol. 10, Nº. 3, 2018
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto Completo Ejemplar
• Resumen

  • The provision of Article 13 TSCG to create an Interparliamentary Conference was the starting point for long discussions after which national parliaments and the European Parliament eventually reached a compromise. This article pursues a two-fold objective: It first examines the different phases of interparliamentary negotiations from 2012 to 2015. On the basis of a distinction between three competing models for interparliamentary cooperation, the article shows that the two models of EP-led scrutiny and creating a collective parliamentary counterweight did not prevail: Parliaments agreed that the new Interparliamentary Conference on Stability, Economic Coordination and Governance (SECG) would follow the 'standard' interparliamentary conference (COSAC model). In terms of national parliaments' actual participation, the lowest common denominator compromise has not changed the numbers of participating MPs: Attendance records are stable over time, the size of national delegations continues to vary and participating MPs are still twice as likely to be members of Budget or Finance committees than to be members of European affairs committees. © 2018 Valentin Kreilinger, published by Sciendo 2018.