Farm household income inequality in Slovenia

• Bojnec, Štefan ^[1] ; Fertő, Imre ^[2]
  1. [1] University of Primorska

     University of Primorska

     Eslovenia

     
  2. [2] Lorand Eotvos Research Network, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Institute of Economics, 1112 Budapest, Budaörsi út 45, Hungary University of Kaposvár, 7400 Kaposvár, Guba Sándor u. 40, Hungary
• Localización: Spanish journal of agricultural research, ISSN-e 2171-9292, ISSN 1695-971X, Vol. 17, Nº. 4, 2019
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
• Resumen

  • Aim of study: To investigate the structure and evolution of farm household income and examine the contribution of different sources of farm household income, particularly the impact of Common Agricultural Policy reform on farm household income inequality in Slovenia.Area of study: Slovenia, one of the European Union member states.Material and methods: A panel data set was compiled using Slovenian Farm Accountancy Data Network data at farm level for the period 2007-2013. Total farm household income was disaggregated into two different components: 1) income components, which can contain market income and off-farm income, and 2) subsidy components, which can contain subsidies from Pillars 1 and 2. Pillar 2 support included subsidies related to agri-environmental measures, less favoured areas and other rural development measures. The income distribution and decomposition were examined using the Gini decomposition method to determine the contribution of each income source and the policy shift from market to government support on farm household income and overall inequality.Main results: A shift in Common Agricultural Policy and related measures determined the structure and evolution of farm household incomes. Off-farm income had a lesser and rather stable impact on farm household income inequality, while the major change involved an increase in the importance of subsidies from Pillar 2 which is consistent with a policy of targeting farms in less favoured areas. Subsidies from Pillar 1 reduced, while market income increased farm household income inequality.Research highlights: Subsidies in farm incomes increased. They could reduce farm household income inequality.