Bringing the sharing-sparing debate down to the ground—Lessons learnt for participatory scenario development

Nina Hagemann; Emma H. van der Zanden; Bárbara A. Willaarts; Annelie Holzkämper; M. Volk; C. Rutz; J.A. Priess; Martin Schönhart

Ayuda

Bringing the sharing-sparing debate down to the ground—Lessons learnt for participatory scenario development

Hagemann, N. ^[1] ; van der Zanden, E.H. ^[3] ; Willaarts, B.A. ^[2] ; Holzkämper, A. ^[4] ; Volk, M. ^[1] ; Rutz, C. ^[5] ; Priess, J.A. ^[1] ; Schönhart, M. ^[6]
1. [1] Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
  
  Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
  
  Kreisfreie Stadt Leipzig, Alemania
2. [2] Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  
  Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  
  Madrid, España
3. [3] Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4. [4] Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Switzerland
5. [5] Institute for Rural Development Research, Germany
6. [6] Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Austria
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Localización: Land use policy: The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use, ISSN 0264-8377, ISSN-e 1873-5754, Nº. 91, 2020
Idioma: inglés
Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
Resumen
- The concepts of Land Sharing (LSH) and Land Sparing (LSP) shall help to manage trade-offs between land use and biodiversity conservation but applications in real world contexts are scarce. We review the literature on scenario and stakeholder processes and present a participatory approach to translate the LSH/LSP concept into practice. It is based on a scenario definition process harmonized across five case studies in Europe and resulted in semi-quantitative participative LSH and LSP scenarios. Harmonization eases comparability among case studies despite fundamentally different scenarios due to heterogeneous conditions across the regions. A key challenge was the right level of standardization for the scenario process to reach a common understanding across case study regions while acknowledging regional peculiarities. The resulting scenarios support for regional specific planning recommendations and can be input to quantitative ecosystem service and biodiversity models.