Resumen de Associations between dietary patterns and metabolic syndrome in adolescents

Guadalupe Ramírez López, Mario Flores, Jorge Salmerón Castro

• español

  Objetivo. Evaluar la asociación de patrones dietarios (PD) con síndrome metabólico (SM) y marcadores metabólicos. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal con 654 adolescentes. Dieta evaluada con el cuestionario “frecuencia de consumos de alimentos”; se identificaron 24 grupos de alimentos, para obtener PD mediante análisis de conglomerados. SM se definió según los criterios: Federación de Diabetes Internacional (IDF), Cook y colaboradores, Ford y colaboradores y Ferranti y colaboradores. Resultados. Se identificaron tres PD: “PD1”, “PD2” y “PD3”. En hombres, “PD3” se asoció con SM (Cook y colaboradores) (RM, 12.14; IC95%, 1.66-89.05), hipertrigliceridemia (RM, 3.89; IC95%, 1.01-15.07) y resistencia a insulina (RM, 6.66; IC95%, 1.12-39.70). El patrón “PD2” se asoció con obesidad abdominal (RM, 5.11; IC95%, 1.57- 16.66). Conclusiones. El patrón “PD3” aumenta el riesgo de SM, hipertrigliceridemia y resistencia a insulina y el “PD2” el riesgo de obesidad abdominal en adolescentes hombres.

• English

  Objective. Evaluate association of dietary patterns with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and metabolic markers. Materials and methods. 654 adolescents from Guadalajara, Jalisco, participated in a cross-sectional study. Diet was evaluated using a food frequency questionnaire; 24 food groups were integrated, and dietary patterns were derived using cluster analysis. MetS was defined according to International Diabetes Federation (IDF), Cook and colleagues, Ford and colleagues, and de Ferranti and colleagues criteria. Results. Dietary patterns identified were: “DP1”, “DP2”, and “DP3”. Among males, “DP3” was associated with MetS (Cook and collaborators) (OR, 12.14; 95%CI, 1.66-89.05), hypertriglyceridemia (OR, 3.89; 95%CI, 1.01-15.07), and insulin resistance (OR, 6.66; 95%CI, 1.12-39.70). “DP2” was associated with abdominal obesity (OR, 5.11; 95%CI, 1.57-16.66). Conclusions. “DP3” entertained a greater risk of MetS, hypertriglyceridemia, and insulin resistance, while “DP2” possessed a greater risk of abdominal obesity among adolescent males.