Resumen de Pandektenwissenschaft und ihre historischen Hintergründe')
This prolonged critique will observe carefully an undoutedly important and timely enterprise initiated by H.-P. Haferkamp and T. Repgen to understand the Pandectist legal thinking immanently which has been often blocked for its rather pejorative reputation such as too conceptual, too systematic, too abstract anf lifeless etc. It will be shown that this significant first step must be surely continued - only with far more attentiveness. Especially one must read the overal complex structure of the Pandectist legal thincking almost with a seismographic sensitiveness and simultaneously with due respect to the general and long-term historical background.
