Normas y discursos. Los conflictos armados y el derecho penal antes y después del 11-S

• Roger Campione ^[1] ; Ana Aldave Orzaiz
  1. [1] Universidad de Oviedo

     Universidad de Oviedo

     Oviedo, España

     
• Localización: Jura Gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale, ISSN-e 1826-8269, Vol. 13, Nº. 1, 2016, págs. 65-91
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • In this paper we will analyze several aspects of the ‘war on terror’ by comparing the classic legal war-paradigm with the security policies that have been activated after 9/11. Taking certain cornestones of ius publicum europaeum as our starting point (such as the distinction between enemy and criminal or the principle of equality between enemies), we will try to show how the current restoration of the ‘just war doctrine’ is increasing the confusion between international responsibility and criminal liability, thereby blurring the distinction between ius ad bellum and ius in bello. However, in our view, the reasons put forward to support these ¨new wars”, far from being new, have on the contrary legitimated a way back to discursive and normative mechanisms that justify war with medieval arguments.