Repeatability and Specificity of Eccentric Force Output and the Implications for Eccentric Training Load Prescription
- Autores: Mellissa Harden, Alex Wolf, G. Gregory Haff, Kirsty M. Hicks, Glyn Howatson
- Localización: Journal of strength and conditioning research: the research journal of the NSCA, ISSN 1064-8011, Vol. 33, Nº. 3, 2019, págs. 676-683
- Idioma: inglés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
-
Resumen
Prescribing supramaximal eccentric (ECC) loads based on repetition maximum, isometric (ISO), or concentric-only (CON) strength overlooks the possibility that individuals have a different tolerance for ECC exercise. To inform the prescription of ECC training regimes, this study implemented a test battery that included maximal accentuated-eccentric (ECC+), traditional coupled eccentric-concentric (TRAD), and 2 ISO conditions (90 and 120[degrees] knee-joint angle [ISO90 and ISO120, respectively]). The study aimed to determine the repeatability and specificity of ECC+ force output and assess the methodological accuracy when using nonspecific measures of strength to prescribe ECC+ training loads. Results show that the test battery was repeatable (p > 0.05, intraclass correlation coefficient >0.95, coefficient of variation: <5.8%) and force output was specific to each task; ECC+ (4,034 +/- 592 N) was higher (p < 0.001) than ISO90 (3,122 +/- 579 N) and TRAD (3,574 +/- 581 N), but less (p < 0.001) than ISO120 (6,285 +/- 1,546 N). Although estimations of ECC+ strength were not different from observed ECC+ values (p > 0.05), estimations were associated with up to a 7% error. This investigation confirms that force output is task-specific; therefore, prescribing ECC loads based on strength during another task will likely lead to discrepancies in intended and actual ECC exercise intensity. Consequently, using an ECC-specific approach to assess ECC strength qualities will provide a more accurate platform to prescribe individualized ECC training programs and a more definitive evaluation of ECC strength.
