How Transparent are EU ‘Comitology’ Committees in Practice?
- Autores: Gijs Jan Brandsma, Deirdre Curtin, Albert Meijer
- Localización: European Law Journal, ISSN-e 1468-0386, Vol. 14, Nº. 6, 2008, págs. 819-838
- Idioma: inglés
- Enlaces
- Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
-
Resumen
Much of the debate on transparency is normative in nature: more transparency is ‘good’ from the perspective of democratic accountability. After all, without information on what decisions are being taken and by whom, it will not be possible for various accountability forums to hold actors to account. This article goes beyond the rhetoric on the need for more transparency in the political system of the EU and examines, in practice as a matter of empirical research, how much transparency there really is. It also goes beyond a purely legal approach to access to information that depends upon the active participation of citizens and others in challenging refusals by specific institutions to grant access to specific documents. We are interested rather in the question as to what extent the institutions are systematically and pro‐actively providing access to their documents via the internet. We focus on the Register of Comitology of the European Commission as a relatively limited case study and, within this context, limit ourselves further to a study of all the documents published in the latest year for which a benchmark was available—2005. Are all comitology documents that exist in fact made available through this public register?
