Postoperative effects on lower third molars of using mouthwashes with super-oxidized solution versus 0.2% chlorhexidine gel: a randomized double-blind trial

• Ana Coello-Gómez ^[1] ; Selene Navarro-Suárez ^[1] ; José-María Diosdado-Cano ^[1] ; Francisco Azcárate-Velazquez ^[1] ; Patricia Bargiela-Pérez ^[1] ; María-Ángeles Serrera-Figallo ^[1] ; Daniel Torres-Lagares ^[1] ; Jose-Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez ^[2]
  1. [1] Universidad de Sevilla

     Universidad de Sevilla

     Sevilla, España

     
  2. [2] Professor of Oral Surgery. Dental School. University of Seville. Head of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service. “Virgen del Rocío” University Hospital
• Localización: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, ISSN-e 1698-6946, Vol. 23, Nº. 6 (November ), 2018
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects and possible benefits with regard to the postoperative period of lower third molar extractions, comparing the intraalveolar application of a bioadhesive gel of 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) to the use of a mouthwash with a super-oxidized solution, (SOS) Dermacyn® Wound Care (Oculus Innovative Sciences lnc., California, USA).

    A randomized double-blind study was carried out in 20 patients with a split-mouth design, with a total of 40 extractions of symmetrically impacted bilateral lower third molars. Patients were divided into two groups, a control group (C = 20) and an experimental group (D = 20). Any infectious complications, wound healing, plaque accumulation in the stitches, and presence of trismus and inflammation were evaluated using the distance between different facial points, at three, eight, and fifteen days after extraction. Pain, swelling, and amount of analgesics taken were evaluated using the VAS scale throughout the 15 days following extraction. Tolerance to treatment was evaluated using a verbal scale. Results were statistically compared using the Student’s t- and chi-squared tests.

    No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to infectious complications, swelling, or wound healing. Use of analgesics and self-reported pain levels were slightly lower in the experimental group than in the control group during days 6 and 7 of the study (p<0.05). The global treatment tolerance was satisfactory and similar in both groups.

    Both CHX and SOS are effective at improving the postoperative period after extraction of lower third molars.