Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
-
X. Merino-Casabiel [6] ; J. Aller [1] ; J. Arbizu [2] ; R. García-Figueiras [3] ; C. González [1] ; E. Grande [4] ; P. Jiménez-Fonseca [5] ; M. I. Sevilla [7] ; J. Capdevila [6]
-
[1] Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Madrid, España
-
[2] Clínica Universitaria de Navarra
Clínica Universitaria de Navarra
Pamplona, España
-
[3] Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, España
-
[4] Hospital Ramón y Cajal
Hospital Ramón y Cajal
Madrid, España
-
[5] Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, España
-
[6] Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron
-
[7] Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Málaga (IBIMA)
-
- Localización: Clinical & translational oncology, ISSN 1699-048X, Vol. 20, Nº. 12, 2018, págs. 1522-1528
- Idioma: inglés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
-
Resumen
Purpose Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of low incidence neoplasms characterized by a low proliferative activity and slow growth. Their response to targeted therapies is heterogeneous and often does not lead to tumor shrinkage. Thus, evaluation of the therapeutic response should differ from other kind of tumors.
Methods To answer relevant questions about which techniques are best in the assessment of progression or treatment response a RAND/UCLA-based consensus process was implemented. Relevant clinical questions were listed followed by a systematic search of the literature. The expert panel answered all questions with recommendations, combining available evidence and expert opinion. Recommendations were validated through a questionnaire and a participatory meeting.
Results Expert recommendations regarding imaging tools for tumor assessment and evaluation of progression were agreed upon. Available imaging techniques were reviewed and recommendations for best patient monitoring practice and the best way to evaluate treatment response were formulated.
