Resumen de 'They Speaked and Wrote Real Good': Judgements of Non-native and Native Grammar

Tracey M. Derwing, Marian J. Rossiter, Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow

• Forty adult native speakers (NSs) listened to a non-native speaker's (NNS) reading of well-formed sentences and those containing grammatical errors of three types (NNS, egregious NS, and high frequency NS). Identified errors were judged for gravity on a 5-point scale. Contrary to our hypothesis, there appears to be no penalty when NNSs make grammatical errors that are also made by some NSs. A second experiment included 20 NS experts, 20 NS non-experts, and 20 advanced proficiency NNSs. All groups identified the three error types and rated them for gravity and annoyance in an aural task; they then identified the same errors in a written task. NNSs and NS experts outperformed non-expert NSs on high frequency NS errors, presumably because of heightened language awareness. The NNSs were significantly more annoyed by high frequency NS and NNS errors than were the NSs and considered all errors to be more serious than did the NSs. Identification of NNS errors was significantly better for all NSs in the aural than in the written mode, but NS experts identified more high frequency NS errors on the written task than on the aural. The differential findings can be attributed to error salience and language awareness.