Resumen de The Brain Health Assessment for Detecting and Diagnosing Neurocognitive Disorders

Katherine L. Possin, Tacie Moskowitz, Sabrina J. Erlhoff, Kirsten M. Rogers, Erica T. Johnson, Natasha Z. R. Steele, Joseph J. Higgins, Jordan Stiver, Andrea G. Alioto, Sarah T. Farias, Bruce L. Miller, Katherine P. Rankin

• Objectives Brief cognitive screens lack the sensitivity to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or support differential diagnoses. The objective of this study was to validate the 10‐minute, tablet‐based University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Brain Health Assessment (BHA) to overcome these limitations.

  Design Cross‐sectional.

  Setting UCSF Memory and Aging Center.

  Participants Older adults (N = 347) (neurologically healthy controls (n = 185), and individuals diagnosed with MCI (n = 99), dementia (n = 42), and as normal with concerns (n = 21)).

  Measurements The BHA includes subtests of memory, executive function and speed, visuospatial skills, and language and an optional informant survey. Participants completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and criterion‐standard neuropsychological tests. Standardized structural 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 145 participants.

  Results At a fixed 85% specificity rate, the BHA had 100% sensitivity to dementia and 84% to MCI; the MoCA had 75% sensitivity to dementia and 25% to MCI. The BHA had 83% sensitivity to MCI likely due to AD and 88% to MCI unlikely due to AD, and the MoCA had 58% sensitivity to MCI likely AD and 24% to MCI unlikely AD. The BHA subtests demonstrated moderate to high correlations with the criterion‐standard tests from their respective cognitive domains. Memory test performance correlated with medial temporal lobe volumes; executive and speed with frontal, parietal, and basal ganglia volumes; and visuospatial with right parietal volumes.

  Conclusion The BHA had excellent combined sensitivity and specificity to detect dementia and MCI, including MCI due to diverse etiologies. The subtests provide efficient, valid measures of neurocognition that are critical in making a differential diagnosis.