Resumen de Osservazioni su Hiatella rugosa (Linné, 1767) endobionte di poriferi e differenze conchigliari con Hiatella arctica (Linné, 1767): (Bivalvia Hiatellidae)

Pasquale Micali, Cristiano Solustri

• English

  Historically, diagnoses of species of the genus Hiatella are based on external conchological characteristics which are, nevertheless, very variable. A short review of the chief scientific works on this topic, emphasizing the different points of view on the exact diagnosis criteria for the right specific determination of Hiatella arctica (Linné, 1767) and Hiatella rugosa (Linné, 1767), is presented herein. Many specimens of H. rugosa endobiont of the sponge Spongia officinalis (Linné, 1758) (Porifera; Dictyoceratida), trawled in the central/northern Adriatic Sea, were measured for biometric purposes. Differences between H. rugosa and H.arctica are discussed. Within the examined sponges (S. officinalis), several molluscan species other than H.rugosa were found: the gastropods Gibbula magus (Linné, 1758) and Hadriania oretea (De Gregorio, 1885) and the bivalves Barbatia barbata (Linné, 1758), Chlamys varia (Linné, 1758), Chlamys multi striata (Poli, 1795) and Neopycnodonte cochlear (Poli, 1795). Anterior-posterior shell length (L), umboventral shell height (H) and the distance between the umbo and the posterior margin (D) were measured for 100 specimens of H. rugosa and 50 specimens of H. arctica collected elsewhere in the Adriatic Sea. Results were plotted and regression equations for both species were calculated for L/H and D/H relationships. The sizerange of H. rugosa found inside S. officinalis was between 13 mm and 31 mm in samples collected in october 2002 and between 4 mm and 30 mm in those from april 2003. In the latter period (april 2003) a moderate recruitment of H. rugosa was observed. Juveniles of H. rugosa were present in the external part of sponge tissues, whilst adults live deeper within the soft tissues of S. officinalis. Burrows made by H. rugosa in the soft tissues of S. officinalis were not observed, it is, thus, probable that the sponges, as they grow, progressively cover the bivalves. Hiatella arctica principally lives in little rock cavities or attached to big bivalve shells (e.g. Pecten, Ostrea, Mytilus) by means of a byssus thread; on the contrary byssus production was not observed in H. rugosa. High variability in shell shape and in the position of the umbo in the latter species of Hiatellidae was confirmed by comparison of the Coefficient of Variability (CV) calculated for ratios between height and length of the shell, and between the distance between the umbo and the posterior margin and total shell length. Hiatella rugosa may be separated from H. arctica by an edentolous hinge, whilst in H. arctica one tooth is present on each valve.

• italiano

  Gli Autori segnalano il ritrovamento di numerosi esemplari di Hiatella rugosa (Linné, 1767) all’interno di grosse spugne della specie Spongia officinalis (Linné, 1758), pescate nell’Adriatico centro-settentrionale.Hiatella rugosa si distingue da Hiatella arctica (Linné, 1767) per avere la cerniera senza denti, mentre in H.arctica è presente un piccolo dente in ogni valva. L’elevata variabilità della forma della conchiglia e della posizione dell’umbone in entrambe le specie è confermata dal confronto dei coefficienti di variabilità (CV) calcolati sui rapporti tra altezza e lunghezza e tra distanza umbo-posteriore e lunghezza totale