Problems with the word made flesh: the great tradition of the scientific revolution in Europe
-
Harold J. Cook [1]
-
[1] Brown University
Brown University
City of Providence, Estados Unidos
-
- Localización: Journal of early modern history, ISSN 1385-3783, Vol. 21, Nº 5, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: After the Scientific Revolution, 2017), págs. 394-406
- Idioma: inglés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
-
Resumen
The Great Tradition of writing about what came to be called The Scientific Revolution developed in the mid-twentieth century and helped to shape what came to be termed “early modern” Europe. At least two fundamental structural elements of the framework were that a small group of independent minds had been set free to grasp new truths, and that rivalries among many groups in Europe never allowed “European civilization” to achieve homeostasis, thus continuing to encourage innovation in conditions of freedom. It is worth noting, however, that the first of these structural elements had religious overtones that were important in the early stages of the Cold War, and that the second placed innovation within a tradition of great texts rather than material culture and practice. Both changed the earlier conversation of the 1930s, which had been about political economies, connecting the new history of science to a history that offered to explain European superiority on the basis of the search for truth. Recent developments in global history, which are rooted in economic histories, challenge such a framing. The brand-name of The Scientific Revolution is common and will remain a useful short-hand, but its meaning requires major revision and should not be limited to the history of Europe.
