Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Objection marking and additivity

    1. [1] University of Amsterdam

      University of Amsterdam

      Países Bajos

  • Localización: Lingua: International review of general linguistics, ISSN 0024-3841, Vol. 122, Nº 15, 2012, págs. 1886-1898
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • The paper tries to contribute to the semantical characterisation of adversative conjunctions and to the explanation of their distribution with respect to other conjunctions.The starting point is the view that all conjunctions including adversative ones can be characterised as special cases of additive marking and that the distributional pattern follows by simple blockingin which the more specific additive marker blocks a less specific one. While this seems to work, the account of dversative conjunctions like but that results in an additive analysis runs into serious problems. The paper tries to do better by developing an alternative account of adversativity in which but -clauses primarily have the function of marking the rhetorical relation of objection: they mark the fact that the speaker is objecting to a proposal that is contextually given. The paper shows how such an account could still explain the distributional facts


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno