Repraesentatio identitatis: l’idée de représentation politique en débat dans la République de Genève lors de la crise de 1707
-
Raphaël Barat [1]
-
[1] Laboratoire de Recherche Historique Rhône-Alpes
Laboratoire de Recherche Historique Rhône-Alpes
Arrondissement de Lyon, Francia
-
- Localización: Parliaments, estates & representation = Parlements, états & représentation, ISSN-e 1947-248X, ISSN 0260-6755, Vol. 37, Nº. 3, 2017, págs. 269-280
- Idioma: francés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
-
Resumen
In the Republic of Geneva, the Small Council and the Great Council considered themselves to be representative of the people, although they were not elected by citizens, but were mutually co-opted instead. There were still elections by the General Council, the assembly of all burgesses and citizens, but they were only meant to promote the members of these co-opted councils to particular magistracies. During the political crisis of 1707, government thinkers tried to justify in theory this conception of representation, which is similar to what the German legal philosopher Hasso Hofmann called repraesentatio identitatis. For them, the Small and the Great Councils were inherently representative of the people owing to their large numbers and their concern for the public interest. The main thinkers of the ‘popular party' not only rejected this argument, but also advocated an alternative political model, with a redistribution of powers between the Councils and the restoration in practice of the sovereignty of the General Council, which it should directly exert. On either side, no project of representative government – in the sense that the Small and the Great Councils would be elected by the people – was ever put forward in these debates.
