Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Mediation and Peace

  • Autores: Johannes Hörner, Massimo Morelli, Francesco Squintani
  • Localización: Review of economic studies, ISSN 0034-6527, Vol. 82, Nº 4, 2015, págs. 1483-1501
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • This article applies mechanism design to the study of international conflict resolution. Standard mechanisms in which an arbitrator can enforce her decisions are usually not feasible because disputants are sovereign entities. Nevertheless, we find that this limitation is inconsequential. Despite only being capable of making unenforceable recommendations, mediators can be equally effective as arbitrators. By using recommendation strategies that do not reveal that one player is weak to a strong opponent, a mediator can effectively circumvent the unenforceability constraint. This is because these strategies make the strong player agree to recommendations that yield the same payoff as arbitration in expectation. This result relies on the capability of mediators to collect confidential information from the disputants, before making their recommendations. Simple protocols of unmediated communication cannot achieve the same level of ex ante welfare, as they preclude confidentiality.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno