Connecting deliberative mini-publics to representative decision making

• Autores: Maija Setälä
• Localización: European journal of political research, ISSN 0304-4130, ISSN-e 1475-6765, Vol. 56, Nº. 4, 2017, págs. 846-863
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 8 Citas
• Resumen

  • Despite some prominent critics, deliberative democrats tend to be optimistic about the potential of deliberative mini-publics. However, the problem with current practices is that mini-publics are typically used by officials on an ad hoc basis and that their policy impacts remain vague. Mini-publics seem especially hard to integrate into representative decision making. There are a number of reasons for this, especially prevailing ideas of representation and accountability as well as the contestatory character of representative politics. This article argues that deliberative mini-publics should be regarded as one possible way of improving the epistemic quality of representative decision making and explores different institutional designs through which deliberative mini-publics could be better integrated into representative institutions. The article considers arrangements which institutionalise the use of mini-publics; involve representatives in deliberations; motivate public interactions between mini-publics and representatives; and provide opportunities to ex post scrutiny or suspensive veto powers for mini-publics. The article analyses prospects and problems of these measures, and considers their applicability in different contexts of representative politics.