Laura Elizabeth Montenegro Guevara
Este trabajo pretende realizar una reflexión, estableciendo un paralelo entre la Psicología Social y la Psicología del Lenguaje, entendiendo que ambas están reguladas por normas y pautas sociales más allá de lo prescriptivo y normativo, implícitas en las normas institucionales sobre el uso del lenguaje y la semántica del discurso utilizada en la actualidad.
This paper aims to establishing a parallel between Social Psychology and Psychology of Language, understanding that both are regulated by social norms and beyond prescriptive and regulatory guidelines, implicit in the institutional rules on the use of language and discourse semantics used today.This paper aims to understand through a literature review descriptive standard language as opposed to institutional or prescriptive standard, in order to perform an analysis of the current communication, the uses of language and forms of expression, in relation to the standards imposedinstitutionally, through a review of the different proposals on standards and their development, from social norms to the perverse rule, in addition with the explanation of language, uses and functions.In the first part of the paper, its presented a description of the theories about standards from social norms to the perverse rule, and this proposal from the Social Psychology of the Psychology of Language will be linked by reviewing the descriptive rules and prescriptive about the use of the proposals by the Royal Academy of Language.The second part of the paper presents a language analysis, functions as a prerequisite in the communication process, emphasizing especially syntactic and pragmatic levels that allow subsequent expression of language.Finally the relationship between them is discussed, to understand the language as a process and product of the person.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados