Resumen de Conflicto estructural y movilización colectiva: formatos y lógicas de las protestas sociales
- español
Este trabajo trata de contextualizar un enfoque socio-estructural del conflicto para el análisis de las protestas sociales desde una perspectiva socio-antropológica. A partir de una selección de protestas nacionales recogidas en prensa entre los años 2006 y 2014, se establecen tres formatos de protesta social y se describen esquemáticamente las lógicas y formas principales de expresión de los diferentes casos tomados como ejemplo. Se supone que tales expresiones, así como las tácticas y acciones emprendidas, se ajustan en cada caso a un modelo concreto, aprendido y previsto sobre “cómo hay que protestar” colectivamente. Estos modelos llevan a los sujetos disconformes a adoptar ciertas pautas disponibles de contestación, desigualmente reguladas y toleradas, para encauzar su oposición e intentar tener éxito en sus demandas.This study aims to contextualise a socio-structural approach to conflict in order to analyse social protests from a socio-anthropological perspective. Using a selection of national newspaper reports from the period 2006 to 2014, it establishes three forms of social protest and schematically describes the principal logics and forms of expression used in the different cases under analysis. It indicates that in each case these expressions and the tactics and actions adopted are in keeping with a specific model on “how to protest” collectively. These models lead the discontent to adopt certain criteria for protestation that are unevenly regulated and tolerated and which are aimed at channelling their opposition and achieving their demands.
- English
This study aims to contextualise a socio-structural approach to conflict in order to analyse social protests from a socio-anthropological perspective. Using a selection of national newspaper reports from the period 2006 to 2014, it establishes three forms of social protest and schematically describes the principal logics and forms of expression used in the different cases under analysis. It indicates that in each case these expressions and the tactics and actions adopted are in keeping with a specific model on "how to protest" collectively. These models lead the discontent to adopt certain criteria for protestation that are unevenly regulated and tolerated and which are aimed at channelling their opposition and achieving their demands.
