Non-State Actors in International Law: A Rejoinder to Professor Thirlway
- Autores: Cedric Ryngaert
- Localización: Netherlands international law review, ISSN 0165-070X, Vol. 64, Nº. 1, 2017, págs. 155-162
- Idioma: inglés
- Enlaces
- Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
-
Resumen
That we consider the state-based system as best representing the individual is the product of a particular world view. A ‘naturalized myth’ renders inevitable the link between the physicality of the observable landscape and the state as a means of organizing a polity. This myth lingers on in international legal scholarship, although it has been debunked in other disciplines, notably in critical political geography. (Public) international lawyers can learn from their brethren in other disciplines and problematize the territorial state as a contingent political concept. Awareness of the social production of space may allow lawyers to imagine practices of resistance to the spatial status quo, in particular rights of non-state actors in the production of international law, alongside states, and obligations and responsibilities of non-state actors, especially where states have proved unable to properly assume roles of protection vis-à-vis individuals under their formal jurisdiction.
