Early bone healing around implant surfaces treated with variations in the resorbable blasting media method. A study in rabbits

• Ryan Jeong ^[1] ; Charles Marin ^[2] ; Rodrigo Granato ^[3] ; Marcelo Suzuki ^[4] ; Jose N Gil ^[3] ; Jose M. Granjeiro ^[5] ; Paulo G. Coelho ^[1]
  1. [1] New York University

     New York University

     Estados Unidos

     
  2. [2] Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

     Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

     Brasil

     
  3. [3] Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

     Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

     Brasil

     
  4. [4] Tufts University

     Tufts University

     City of Medford, Estados Unidos

     
  5. [5] Universidade Federal Fluminense

     Universidade Federal Fluminense

     Brasil

     

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, ISSN-e 1698-6946, Vol. 15, Nº. 1 (January ), 2010
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • Objective: this study aimed to histomorphologically and histomorphometrically evaluate the in vivo response to three variations in the resorbable blasting media (RBM) surface processing in a rabbit femur model. Study Design:

    screw root form implants with 3.75 mm in diameter by 8 mm in length presenting four surfaces (n=8 each):

    alumina-blasted/acid-etched (AB/AE), bioresorbable ceramic blasted (TCP), TCP + acid etching, and AB/AE + TCP were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The implants were placed at the distal femur of 8 New Zeland rabbits, remaining for 2 weeks in vivo. After sacrifice, the implants were nondecalcified processed to 30 micro m thickness slides for histomorphology and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) determination. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA at 95% level of significance considering implant surface as the independent variable and BIC as the dependent variable. Results: SEM and AFM showed that all surfaces presented rough textures and that calciu-hosohate particles were observed at the TCP group surface. Histologic evaluation showed intimate interaction between newly formed woven bone and all implant surfaces, demonstrating that all surfaces were biocompatible and osseoconductive. Significant differences in BIC were observed between the AB/AE and the AB/AE + TCP, and intermediate values observed for the TCP and TCP + Acid surfaces. Conclusion: irrespective of RBM processing variation, all surfaces were osseoconductive and biocaompatible. The differences in BIC between groups warrant further bone-implant interface biomechanical characterization.