Christian Dahlman's Reflections on the Basic Norm

• Autores: Stanley L. Paulson
• Localización: Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, ARSP, ISSN 0001-2343, Vol. 91, Nº 1, 2005, págs. 96-108
• Idioma: alemán
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • In his introductory section, Christian Dahlman points to various “absurdities” or “self-contradictions” generated by the basic norm. I adduce arguments showing that these “absurdities” or “self-contradictions” do not arise – not, at any rate, from Dahlman's premises. In his central section, Dahlman sets out three purported problems and claims to resolve them by appeal to one or another of the “three basic norms” that he adumbrates. None of these problems is resolved by Dahlman. Specifically, I adduce arguments showing that the first problem is a straw man of Dahlman's own making, his resolution of the second problem turns on his confusion of the fictitious basic norm in Kelsen's post-1960 period with the basic norm of ostensibly normative import in Kelsen's classical or neo-Kantian phase, and, finally, Dahlman's resolution of the third problem turns on his confusion of Kelsen's basic norm with H. L. A. Hart's rule of recognition. I close with remarks on Kelsen's own conception of the juridico-theoretical problems he faced.