In this article we argue that linguistic evidence, particularly coming from language athologies, point out that Fodor’s Modularity of Mind Hypothesis is too strong. In its place we defend a weaker version of it, meaning that the language faculty is not conditioned by any specific sensorial modality, as signed languages show, and where modular systems can interact among them
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados