Living in dose: : Nuclear work and the politics of permissible exposure

• Autores: Shannon Cram
• Localización: Public culture, ISSN-e 1527-8018, Vol. 28, Nº. 3, 2016, págs. 519-539
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • This article explores the politics of permissible exposure for US nuclear workers. I argue that despite recent efforts to improve regulations for occupational radiation protection, the federal government has been unable to solve the fundamental paradox of nuclear safety: that some level of exposure is unavoidable when working with nuclear materials and that any level of exposure comes with an associated biological risk. In short, injury is an operational necessity of nuclear industry. Thus nuclear safety can never mean total protection for workers—it can only ever be the level of exposure that has been deemed acceptable relative to the benefits of radiation. In this article, I trace the historical development and daily life of this cost-benefit calculus. I consider how acceptable risk frames exposure as integral to economic development and national security, normalizing nuclear injury as an unfortunate, yet necessary, part of modern life and work.