Petrarch’s sonnet RVF 180, remarkable for its uncommonly joyful tone, contrasts equal and opposite movements: The river, flowing eastward towards dawn, distances the lyrical ‘I’ from his ‘dolce soggiorno’, Laura; still, his mind, moving westward with the course of the sun, flies back to her. Transcending common readings of these motives (instances of the navigatio and the ‘flight of the soul’) as Christian allegories, this article’s first section highlights forms of allusivity which problematize such readings. Laura’s inscription in the text is twofold: The beloved is present paronomastically as well as by metonymical reference to the Apollon/ Daphne-episode of Ovid’s Metamorphoses. The river Po, removing the lyrical ‘I’ from his beloved, is, by means of intertextual references to Vergil, identified with the mythical Eridanos, the river the same Apollon’s son Phaëthon was cast into by Zeus’s flash of lightning. The opposite movements evoked by the poem, and with them the lyrical I’s contradictory experience, are thus sublated in a unitary diegetic continuum supplied by Ovid’s fashioning of ancient myth. Its uncommonly joyful tonality becomes readable as epiphenomenal to this sublation. Central to this reading is an adequate consideration of the poem’s intertextual dimension, which this article’s second section (IV–V) takes as point of departure for the discussion of intertextuality as a challenge for translation and translation theory. This discussion is led on the basis of the totality of German translations of this poem extant, ranging from 1774 to the present day.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados