Study Design, Publication Outcome, and Funding of Research Presented at International Congresses on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication

• Mario Malički ^[1] ; Erik von Elm ^[2] ; Ana Marušić ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Split

     University of Split

     Croacia

     
  2. [2] Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
• Localización: JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association, ISSN 0098-7484, Vol. 311, Nº. 10, 2014, págs. 1066-1066
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto Completo Ejemplar
• Resumen

  • The first International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication (PRC) was organized in 1989 to “subject the editorial review process to some of the rigorous scrutiny that editors and reviewers demand of the scientists whose work they are assessing.”1 Since then, peer review research was introduced as a Medical Subject Heading (MeSH),2 and the number of indexed articles has been continuously increasing. To evaluate the development of peer review research in biomedicine, we analyzed research presented at all PRCs since 1989.