Resumen de Hemodynamic Responses to Resistance Exercise in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Terje F. Gjovaag, Kari Anette Bruusgaard, Peyman Mirtaheri, Kristoffer Simon, Goran Berdal, Irja Tuchel, Tonje Westlie, Birgitta Blakstad Nilsson, Jonny Hisdal
AB Purpose: Investigate hemodynamic responses of resistance exercise (RE) with moderate load (i.e., international guidelines for RE of patients) versus RE with high load in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Medically stable male (n = 11) and female patients (n = 4) treated with PCI or percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass surgery a minimum of 6 months before this study, performed three sets of 15RM and 4RM RE in a randomized order on separate days. Beat-to-beat systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were monitored at preexercise, and continuously during RE. Results: Compared with preexercise, SBP and DBP (mean of three sets) increased by 12% to 13% (both; P < 0.001) and 35% to 40% after 15RM RE (both; P < 0.001). 15RM SBP and DBP were higher than 4RM SBP and DBP (both; P < 0.001). The SBP of the fourth repetition of 15 RM RE was similar to the SBP of the fourth repetition of 4RM RE. Compared with preexercise, SV increased moderately after 4RM and 15 RM RE, respectively (both, P < 0.001). HR increased more after 15RM compared with 4RM RE (P < 0.05); thus, higher CO after 15RM (compared with 4RM RE; P < 0.05) was mainly caused by higher HR. SVR decreased by 15% (P < 0.001) and 50% (P < 0.01) after 4RM and 15RM RE. Conclusions: SBP and DBP increased significantly more during moderate load RE; thus, the magnitude of the external load is not the prime determinant of the pressure response during RE. If management of blood pressure is of concern, high load/low rep RE is preferable to medium load/high rep RE.
