The Pathogenesis of Implant-Related Reactive Lesions: A Clinical, Histologic and Polarized Light Microscopy Study

• Michal Halperin-Sternfeld ^[1] ; Edmond Sabo ^[2] ; Sharon Akrish ^[2]
  1. [1] Department of Periodontology, School of Graduate Dentistry, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
  2. [2] Department of Pathology, Rambam Health Care Campus.
• Localización: Journal of periodontology, ISSN 0022-3492, Vol. 87, Nº. 5, 2016, págs. 502-510
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Background: Peri-implant soft tissue reactive lesions (I-RLs) may jeopardize implant success and survival. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, its pathogenesis is unknown. The objective of this study is to conduct a clinicopathologic and polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis of 14 new I-RLs and compare them with comparable tooth-associated cases (T-RLs) to better understand I-RL pathogenesis.

    Methods: Fifty-eight new cases of I-RL and T-RL were retrieved from the pathology department archives of Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. Retrospective analysis of histopathologic and clinical features was conducted, documented, and then compared for: 1) I-RL (n = 14), 2) peri-implant pyogenic granuloma (I-PG) (n = 5), 3) peri-implant peripheral giant cell granuloma (I-PGCG) (n = 9), 4) T-RL (n = 44), 5) tooth-associated pyogenic granuloma (T-PG) (n = 21), and 6) tooth-associated peripheral giant cell granuloma (T-PGCG) (n = 23). Presence of foreign bodies was assessed using PLM.

    Results: Foreign bodies were found more commonly in I-RLs (n = 13/14; 93%) when compared with T-RLs (n = 18/44; 41%), which was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.01) with an odds ratio of 7.9. Microscopically, I-PGCG was associated with: 1) lower multinucleated giant cell count (P = 0.04); 2) lower density of mesenchymal cells (P = 0.05); and 3) more diffuse, non-lobulated stromal morphology (P = 0.001). Clinically, I-RLs were found in patients who were older, and all cases were located in the posterior region: mandible (n = 12/14; 86%) and maxilla (n = 2/14; 14%).

    Conclusions: In cases of implant failure, implantation of foreign bodies may play a role with subsequent development of I-PG and I-PGCG-like lesions. Clinicians should be aware of this risk so they can implement measures to minimize adverse implant outcomes.