Hildegard Matthies, Stella Rehbein
It is an uncontroversial fact that the New Governance of Science led to increased pressure on scientists to adapt to new imperatives.
But how scientists actually respond to these new invocations and how the gender category becomes relevant in this context (or not) is not yet studied sufficiently.
In this article, we introduce three patterns of responsiveness in, ignorance, adaptation and ambivalence, which illustrate the manifold options of dealing with the institutional change. The patterns do not correspond to a binary gender logic, rather the empirical material shows a salient tendency of ignorance and neutralization of the category of gender so that differences within biographies and careers are individualized and thereby also immunized against feminist critique.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados