Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Resumen de New genomic and fossil data illuminate the origin of enamel

Qingming Qu, Tatjana Haitina, Min Zhu, Per E. Ahlberg

  • Enamel, the hardest vertebrate tissue, covers the teeth of almost all sarcopterygians (lobe-finned bony fishes and tetrapods) as well as the scales and dermal bones of many fossil lobe-fins1,2,3,4,5. Enamel deposition requires an organic matrix containing the unique enamel matrix proteins (EMPs) amelogenin (AMEL), enamelin (ENAM) and ameloblastin (AMBN)6. Chondrichthyans (cartilaginous fishes) lack both enamel and EMP genes7,8. Many fossil and a few living non-teleost actinopterygians (ray-finned bony fishes) such as the gar, Lepisosteus, have scales and dermal bones covered with a proposed enamel homologue called ganoine1,9. However, no gene or transcript data for EMPs have been described from actinopterygians10,11. Here we show that Psarolepis romeri, a bony fish from the the Early Devonian period, combines enamel-covered dermal odontodes on scales and skull bones with teeth of naked dentine, and that Lepisosteus oculatus (the spotted gar) has enam and ambn genes that are expressed in the skin, probably associated with ganoine formation. The genetic evidence strengthens the hypothesis that ganoine is homologous with enamel. The fossil evidence, further supported by the Silurian bony fish Andreolepis, which has enamel-covered scales but teeth and odontodes on its dermal bones made of naked dentine12,13,14,15,16, indicates that this tissue originated on the dermal skeleton, probably on the scales. It subsequently underwent heterotopic expansion across two highly conserved patterning boundaries (scales/head–shoulder and dermal/oral) within the odontode skeleton.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus