Effect of retention design of artificial teeth and implant-supported titanium CAD-CAM structures on fracture resistance

• Autores: Kristin Ladetzki, Rocío Mateos Palacios, Agustín Pascual Moscardó, Eduardo José Selva Otaolaurruchi
• Localización: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, ISSN-e 1989-5488, Vol. 8, Nº. 2 (Abril), 2016, págs. 113-118
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Background: For implant-supported hybrid prostheses, high mastication forces and reduced acrylic resin thickness over a metal substructure often cause failures arising from tooth or resin fractures. To assay fracture resistance of artificial teeth and resin in implant-supported hybrid prostheses in relation to the titanium structure and retention design supporting teeth.

    Material and Methods: 40 specimens bearing incisors were divided into four groups according to the titanium structure supporting the teeth and the type of load force applied: Group I (Control; n=10): Application of static loading to ten incisors set over a metal structure with internal retention. Group II (Control; n=10): Application of static loading to ten incisors set over a metal structure with external retention. The remaining study specimens (n=20) were subjected to 120,000 masticatory and thermal cycles in a chewing simulator. Afterwards, static loading was applied until the point of fracture using an Instron machine. Group III (Study; n=10): Application of dynamic and static loading to ten incisors set over a metal structure with internal retention. Group IV (Study; n=10): Application of dynamic and static loading to ten incisors set over a metal structure with external retention. Data obtained for the four groups was analyzed and compared, determining the type of fracture (cohesive or adhesive) using a reflected light microscope.

    Results: Statistical analysis confirmed that there were significant differences in fracture resistance between the four groups. External retention was found to have more fracture resistance than the internal retention.

    Conclusions: Hybrid prostheses with titanium substructures and external retention obtained significantly better results than samples with internal retention.