An Assessment of the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trial Reports Published in Prosthodontic and Implant Dentistry Journals

• Spyridon ^[1] ; Dimitrios ^[2] ; Haralampos ^[3] ; Cert ^[4] ; Nikolaos ^[5]
  1. [1] N. Papageorgiou
  2. [2] Kloukos
  3. [3] Petridis
  4. [4] Prosthod
  5. [5] Pandis

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: The International Journal of Prosthodontics, ISSN-e 1942-4426, Vol. 28, Nº. 6, 2015, págs. 586-593
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in prosthodontic and implant dentistry journals. Materials and Methods: The last 30 issues of 9 journals in the field of prosthodontic and implant dentistry (Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Clinical Oral Implants Research, Implant Dentistry, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, International Journal of Prosthodontics, Journal of Dentistry, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, and Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry) were hand-searched for RCTs. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool and analyzed descriptively. Results: From the 3,667 articles screened, a total of 147 RCTs were identified and included. The number of published RCTs increased with time. The overall distribution of a high risk of bias assessment varied across the domains of the Cochrane risk of bias tool: 8% for random sequence generation, 18% for allocation concealment, 41% for masking, 47% for blinding of outcome assessment, 7% for incomplete outcome data, 12% for selective reporting, and 41% for other biases. Conclusion: The distribution of high risk of bias for RCTs published in the selected prosthodontic and implant dentistry journals varied among journals and ranged from 8% to 47%, which can be considered as substantial.