In this paper I look at indicative nested whether-conditionals, sentences like:
If I pass the exam, I will pass whether I pray or not.
The behavior of ‘if’ in these examples is to be contrasted with the behavior of ‘if’ in or-to-if conditionals:
If Mary is at home or at work, then if she is not at home, she is at work.
I argue that no currently available semantics for indicative conditionals can explain both the behavior of ‘if’ in nested whether-conditionals and the behavior of ‘if’ in or-to-ifs. We need a theory that predicts both. While no currently available theory makes the right predictions, one theory comes close—Heim’s rendition of Stalnaker’s semantics (Heim in J Semant 9(3):183–221, 1992). I show how to fix Heim’s view to get the right results for all cases. In sum, the paper argues for a particular development of Stalnaker’s semantics, and shows that whether-conditionals cannot be dealt with on other approaches.
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados